KFTCGacha Probability DisclosureMisleading RepresentationFalse Probability Representation

South Korea's Gaming Probability Regulation Strikes Again: Krafton and Com2uS Penalized for False Disclosure

韩国游戏概率监管再出手:Krafton 与 Com2uS 因虚假公示遭罚

January 13, 2026
19 views

Summary

Since Korea introduced stricter gacha probability disclosure rules, the Korea Fair Trade Commission (KFTC) has significantly stepped up enforcement. In 2025, KRAFTON and Com2uS were sanctioned for misrepresenting item and gacha probabilities in PUBG and Starseed. KRAFTON falsely advertised zero or 9% probability items as much higher and promoted a misleading “guaranteed” system, while Com2uS falsely claimed that all equipment granted enhancement effects. Although both companies corrected the issues and provided compensation before the investigations concluded, the KFTC still imposed fines and corrective orders. However, business suspension was avoided due to their timely remediation and consumer compensation. These cases confirm that probability disclosure is now a regulatory red line in Korea.

Since the implementation of new regulations on in-game probability disclosure in 2024, the Korea Fair Trade Commission (KFTC) has intensified its enforcement efforts. Following penalties against Gravity and Wemade, two more Korean game companies have been sanctioned for violations related to probability disclosure.

In May last year, the Korea Fair Trade Commission (KFTC) launched investigations into Krafton Inc. and Com2uS Co., Ltd. for falsifying in-game probability rates in their titles PUBG and Starseed. A year later, the KFTC finalized its penalties, imposing a combined fine of 5 million won on both companies and issuing corrective orders (including future prohibition orders and reports on measures to prevent recurrence).

PART 1

Detailed Analysis of PUBG and Starseed Game Penalties

Krafton sold two types of probabilistic items in PUBG, including Processing and the PUBG x New Jeans set. From March 22 to April 8, 2024, Krafton falsely informed users that 31 items obtainable through Processing had actual drop rates ranging from 0.1414% to 0.7576%, despite their actual rates being 0%.

(Processing Probability of False Claims)

During the PUBG x New Jeans bundle event held on June 12, 2024 (for sales on June 13, 2024), the official guarantee mechanism promised: if the item fails to drop after 4 attempts, the 5th attempt guarantees a 100% drop rate. However, actual calculations reveal that the probability of obtaining the item on the 5th attempt is only 9%.

(PUBG x New Jeans Set Event Probability Misrepresentation)

During the period from March 28, 2024, to May 9, 2024, Com2us falsely advertised that the “Quick Battle Compensation” items sold to Starseed game users would grant a 24% probability of enhancing the equipment worn by the game character upon purchase. However, actual testing revealed that only Equipment 1 had a 24% probability of this effect, while the other two equipment types completely lacked such benefits.

(Starseed Game Event Probability Misrepresentation)

Both companies had already implemented corrective measures prior to the KFTC investigation. PUBG updated its probability disclosure on April 11, 2024, to address the inaccuracies and provided compensation to affected players.

Starseed Games corrected errors and announced a related compensation plan on May 9, 2024.

PART 2

Proactive Compensation Avoids Service Suspension Penalty

Similar to previous penalties imposed on Gravity and Wemade, the KFTC has only fined both companies 2.5 million won each this time, without mandating a business suspension.

Regarding penalties for violating the Consumer Protection Act for E-Commerce, Article 32 stipulates that the KFTC may order operators to take corrective measures for illegal activities. These measures typically include: ceasing illegal conduct, fulfilling legal obligations, publicly disclosing the corrective actions taken, implementing necessary measures to prevent and remedy consumer losses, and taking necessary steps to rectify other violations.

These corrective measures are also frequently employed by the KFTC in cases involving penalties for falsifying probability disclosures. Beyond these measures, Article 32(4) of the Act actually specifies circumstances under which the KFTC may order a business operator to suspend all or part of its operations for up to one year:

1. When, despite a corrective measure order issued under the first item, the illegal act recurs and the severity of the violation exceeds the standards stipulated by Presidential Decree.

2. Failure to comply with the corrective action order.

3. When it is determined that corrective actions alone are insufficient to prevent consumer harm or compensate for damages incurred.

Legally speaking, if a suspension order is imposed, the circumstances of the violation must be exceptionally severe. Of course, suspension of business is not the only option. Pursuant to Article 34 of the Act, if the KFTC determines that imposing suspension under Article 32(4) would cause significant inconvenience to consumers or others, it may instead impose a fine not exceeding the sales amount related to the violation. Where no relevant sales amount exists or cannot be calculated, a fine not exceeding 50 million won may be imposed.

Returning to the current penalty outcome, the KFTC considered that both companies voluntarily corrected the violations, the duration of the violations was relatively short, and both companies provided compensation measures to consumers. Consequently, the KFTC ultimately did not impose the business suspension penalty.

PART 3

Probability Disclosure Remains a Key Focus of Korean Regulation

From the first game company penalized last year to the present, Korea's oversight of probability disclosure has never relaxed. Coupled with the implementation of the agent system for overseas companies, the previous difficulty in regulating and penalizing foreign game companies will also change. Whether domestic Korean companies or overseas game companies, none can escape regulatory penalties.

However, this year's penalty cases suggest that proactively implementing compensation measures may mitigate the severity of KFTC sanctions—depending on the compensation plans offered by game companies. Notably, KRAFTON refunded a total of 1.173 billion KRW (approximately 6.15 million RMB) to affected users and restored or compensated in-game items valued at 9.858 billion KRW. Com2uS went further by compensating all players with 200,000 KRW (approximately 1,000 RMB) each, plus additional in-game item compensation for some users. Of course, the final compensation amount isn't the sole criterion. The KFTC comprehensively evaluates the company's attitude and the nature of the violation (including whether it was persistent and the extent of profits gained).

For the Korean market, we remind companies that probability disclosure issues should not be taken lightly, especially with the implementation of the agent system this year, which demands even greater caution.

中文原文

自2024年游戏内概率公示新规施行后,韩国公平交易委员会执法频繁。继Gravity公司和Wemade公司后,又有两家韩国游戏公司因概率公示问题而被处罚。

去年5月,韩国公平交易委员会(KFTC)对Krafton株式会社、Com2uS株式会社因旗下PUBG和Starseed游戏内概率造假进行调查。时隔一年,KFTC最终做出处罚,对两家公司处以共计500万韩元的罚款,并发出纠正命令(未来的禁止令和防止再次发生的措施报告)。

PART 1

PUBG和Starseed游戏处罚细节剖析

Krafton在PUBG游戏中出售两种概率性道具,包括Processing和PUBG x New Jeans 套装。Krafton从2024年3月22日到2024年4月8日, 通过Processing可获得的道具(构成品)中, 其中有31个的实际获得率为0%, 但Krafton以0.1414%至0.7576%虚假地告知用户。

(Processing概率虚假情况)

而在2024年6月12日指2024年6月13日销售的PUBG x New Jeans 套装活动中,官方承诺保底机制:如果4次未能抽取,则第5次100%抽取。但经过实际计算,第5次抽取的概率仅为9%。

(PUBG x New Jeans 套装活动概率虚假情况)

Com2us在2024年3月28日至2024年5月9日期间向Starseed游戏用户销售的“快速作战补偿”道具时,谎称用户购买道具可获得的游戏角色所穿装备增强效果的概率均为24%。然而实际测试发现,只有装备1的概率为24%,其余两种装备完全没有此类效果。
(Starseed游戏活动概率虚假情况)

两家公司其实在KFTC展开调查前就采取了补充措施。PUBG游戏于2024年4月11日就概率公示错误进行更新并针对相关玩家予以补偿。

Starseed游戏于2024年5月9日更正错误并公布相关补偿方案。

PART 2

主动补偿免于停服处罚
与此前Gravity公司和Wemade公司处罚情况相同,此次KFTC给两家公司仅处以各250万韩元的罚款,而并未强制要求停业整顿。

关于违反《电子商务等消费者保护法》规定的处罚,该法第32条针对经营者的违法行为,提出KFTC可命令经营者采取纠正措施。纠正措施一般包括停止违法行为、履行法律规定的义务、公布被采取纠正措施的事实、预防及救济消费者损失的必要措施和纠正其他违反行为的必要措施。

以上纠正措施也是KFTC在概率公示造假处罚案件中经常采取的措施方式了。而除以上措施外,该法第32条第4款其实也提到了KFTC可命令经营者在一年以内全部或部分停止营业的情形:

1.尽管根据第一项规定发出纠正措施命令,但违法行为仍然重复发生,且违法程度超过总统令规定的标准。

2.不遵守纠正措施命令的情况。

3.判断仅通过纠正措施难以防止消费者遭受损害,或者无法补偿消费者遭受的损害时。

从法律规定来看,如果上升到停业整顿的处罚,该处罚情节想必是相当严重了。当然停业整顿也不是唯一的选择方式,根据该法第34条的规定,如果KFTC判断根据第32条第4款规定的停业整顿可能会给消费者等带来严重不便时,可以处以与违法行为相关的销售额以下的罚款以替代。如没有相关销售额或无法计算销售额的,则可处以5000万韩元以下的罚款。

回到此次的处罚结果,KFTC在决定处罚时考虑到两家公司自行纠正了违法行为,违法时间较短,且两家公司向消费者提供了损失补偿措施,最终没有处以停业整顿的处罚。

PART 3

概率公示依然是韩国监管重点

从去年第一家游戏公司被惩戒到今年,韩国对于概率公示的监管从未放松。再加上海外公司的代理人制度的落地,以往海外游戏公司难以监管处罚的情况也会有所变化。无论是韩国本土公司还是海外游戏公司,都难逃监管处罚。

不过从今年的处罚案例来看,主动采取补偿措施,或许可以减轻KFTC处罚的力度,就看游戏公司给出的补偿方案了。毕竟本次KRAFTON向相关用户退款共计11.73亿韩元(约615万人民币)并恢复道具或补偿价值共计98.58亿韩元的道具;Com2us更是针对所有玩家各给予了20万韩元(约1000元人民币)的补偿,并针对部分玩家给予了道具补偿。当然最终补偿的金额也不是衡量的标准,游戏公司的态度和违法情形(包括违法行为持续行为、获利情况等)才是KFTC综合衡量的内容。

针对韩国市场,我们提醒概率公示问题不可掉以轻心,尤其是在今年代理人制度落地后,更是需要谨慎。

分享文章

相关文章

General

Game Licensing (ISBN Approval): Can Cultural Enforcement Be Exercised Across Regions?

游戏版号,文化执法也能异地?

This article analyzes the legality and rationality of cross-regional administrative enforcement in game licensing cases in China. It argues that, under the current legal framework, enforcement should follow the principle of territorial jurisdiction, as the place of illegal conduct is typically tied to the location of the game company. Cross-regional enforcement may lead to jurisdictional conflicts, increased compliance burdens, and risks of profit-driven enforcement, thereby undermining the business environment and procedural fairness.

6 views
General

Twitch bans streamers from “promoting or sponsoring” CS:GO skin gambling

Twitch禁止主播“推广或赞助”CSGO皮肤赌博

Twitch has updated its community guidelines to further restrict gambling-related content, explicitly banning the promotion and sponsorship of skin gambling websites, particularly those مرتبط with Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. Since 2022, Twitch has prohibited the promotion of gambling sites that are not licensed in jurisdictions with consumer protections, naming platforms such as Stake, Rollbit, and Roobet. The latest update expands these restrictions to include CS:GO skin gambling sites and their free social versions, while also banning links, promo codes, and visual displays of such content. Twitch stated that the move responds to renewed interest in CS:GO skin gambling.

4 views
General

U.S. Market Expansion: New Age Verification Method Under COPPA

美国出海:COPPA下新的年龄验证方法

To facilitate compliance with the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA), the Entertainment Software Rating Board (ESRB), together with other U.S. institutions, has proposed a new mechanism for obtaining verifiable parental consent (VPC). The proposal relies on privacy-protective facial age estimation technology, developed with technical support from Yoti and SuperAwesome. The U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is currently soliciting public comments on whether this method falls within existing COPPA-approved verification methods, whether it satisfies the statutory requirements for parental consent, and whether it introduces privacy risks, including those related to biometric information. The proposal signals a potentially significant development in age verification compliance for online platforms and gaming services operating in the United States.

5 views